When our California lemon law was passed many years ago, the automobile manufacturers were allowed to set up NON-binding arbitration as an OPTION for the consumer to utilize in an attempt to settle their lemon law dispute. Consumers in California must realize that these dispute resolution mediums are often nothing more than a way for automobile manufacturers to be given “another chance” at fixing the consumers vehicle. One of the three potential decisions that can be handed down at an arbitration hearing is “the repair decision”. The automobile manufacturers representative argues to the arbitrator that the manufacturer should be given an additional attempt to repair the vehicle, or argue that they (coincidentally) “now have a fix developed” for the consumers repeated defect. The consumer often goes into a arbitration hearing expecting a “win” or “lose” decision, but becomes stunned when finding out that the outcome of their arbitration hearing for their lemon law claim is simply to have their vehicle repaired again! Arbitrators are not lawyers. Arbitration is NOT required to pursue legal remedy in California under the lemon law.